By — Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press By — Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/democratic-states-file-new-lawsuit-seeking-to-block-trumps-order-limiting-mail-voting-in-midterms Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Judge lifts major obstacle for Trump mail voting order as states file new challenge ahead of midterms Politics Updated on Aug 26, 2026 4:25 PM EDT — Published on Aug 26, 2026 12:07 PM EDT A federal judge on Wednesday lifted a major obstacle to President Donald Trump's executive order limiting mail voting, even as Democratic state officials filed a new court challenge with the midterm elections fast approaching. The fresh round of legal wrangling comes just two days after the Supreme Court handed down a procedural ruling in Trump's favor, and could mean the issue lands before the high court again before the pivotal contests for control of Congress. The first mailed ballots are set to be sent out next week. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston agreed to lift an order prohibiting the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out Trump's order for November's elections. She wrote that she was "compelled" to do so after the Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled that a similar injunction she granted in a separate case was premature. Talwani nevertheless said the executive order could unleash "chaos" and referred to it as "likely unconstitutional." WATCH: Battleground state election officials respond to Trump's efforts to reshape voting process The administration can now move forward and implement a Postal Service rule published late Friday. It would require states to follow a uniform envelope style for mail ballots and to give the Postal Service a list of voters eligible to receive them. A new chapter in high-stakes litigation The new lawsuit, filed by about two dozen Democratically controlled states against the U.S. Postal Service, marked a new phase in the high-stakes litigation. It came after the Supreme Court ruled against them in a separate case, but did not say Trump's order was legal. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. The high court majority found the Democratic lawsuit was premature, but that was before the Republican administration issued a rule governing U.S. Postal Service delivery of mail ballots. Election officials warn it will be impossible to implement in the days before the first wave of mail ballots are sent out next week. "Across the country, states are already deep into preparations for the 2026 elections. Now, at the last moment, the federal government is attempting to meddle in those preparations and potentially threaten countless Americans' right to vote," New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of 25 Democratic attorneys general filing the lawsuit, said in a statement. "USPS has no authority to decide who can and cannot vote by mail." WATCH: Constitutional law professor explains Supreme Court's ruling on mail-in voting The Trump administration plan faces a third lawsuit originally filed in May in the nation's capital, though courts there have so far declined to block it. All previous challenges were filed before the administration published its mail ballot rule Friday night. White House spokesperson Lauren Bis on Wednesday said the Postal Service's proposals were "commonsense measures that protect the security of mail-in ballots" and that the administration would continue to work to implement them to boost "the safety and security of our elections." The Postal Service said it would not comment because of the pending lawsuit. National Democrats on Tuesday cited the rule in asking the federal judge in the Washington case to block Trump's order after he declined to do so last spring, saying the administration at the time had not taken concrete action. WATCH: Ousted Election Assistance Commission chair on Trump's effort to control voting In Boston, Talwani also found that the administration had violated a separate injunction she had placed on the Postal Service in drafting the new rule, although she did not take any action against the government. The League of Women Voters originally filed that lawsuit, and on Wednesday they also asked for a new court order blocking the mail voting plan. Voting by mail has long been on Trump's radar Trump has long targeted mail voting, which he falsely blames for his 2020 election loss and is disproportionately used by Democrats as a result of Trump's condemnations. Since returning to power, Trump has tried to claim authority over election rules, saying he thinks Republicans should "take over" vote counting in Democratic areas. He issued his first election executive order just months after retaking office, attempting to require documentary proof of citizenship to vote, among other changes. He has also been pushing a sweeping election bill that has stalled in the Senate amid opposition from Democrats and even some within his own party. A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now By — Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press Associated Press By — Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press
A federal judge on Wednesday lifted a major obstacle to President Donald Trump's executive order limiting mail voting, even as Democratic state officials filed a new court challenge with the midterm elections fast approaching. The fresh round of legal wrangling comes just two days after the Supreme Court handed down a procedural ruling in Trump's favor, and could mean the issue lands before the high court again before the pivotal contests for control of Congress. The first mailed ballots are set to be sent out next week. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston agreed to lift an order prohibiting the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out Trump's order for November's elections. She wrote that she was "compelled" to do so after the Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled that a similar injunction she granted in a separate case was premature. Talwani nevertheless said the executive order could unleash "chaos" and referred to it as "likely unconstitutional." WATCH: Battleground state election officials respond to Trump's efforts to reshape voting process The administration can now move forward and implement a Postal Service rule published late Friday. It would require states to follow a uniform envelope style for mail ballots and to give the Postal Service a list of voters eligible to receive them. A new chapter in high-stakes litigation The new lawsuit, filed by about two dozen Democratically controlled states against the U.S. Postal Service, marked a new phase in the high-stakes litigation. It came after the Supreme Court ruled against them in a separate case, but did not say Trump's order was legal. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Enter your email address Subscribe Form error message goes here. Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm. The high court majority found the Democratic lawsuit was premature, but that was before the Republican administration issued a rule governing U.S. Postal Service delivery of mail ballots. Election officials warn it will be impossible to implement in the days before the first wave of mail ballots are sent out next week. "Across the country, states are already deep into preparations for the 2026 elections. Now, at the last moment, the federal government is attempting to meddle in those preparations and potentially threaten countless Americans' right to vote," New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of 25 Democratic attorneys general filing the lawsuit, said in a statement. "USPS has no authority to decide who can and cannot vote by mail." WATCH: Constitutional law professor explains Supreme Court's ruling on mail-in voting The Trump administration plan faces a third lawsuit originally filed in May in the nation's capital, though courts there have so far declined to block it. All previous challenges were filed before the administration published its mail ballot rule Friday night. White House spokesperson Lauren Bis on Wednesday said the Postal Service's proposals were "commonsense measures that protect the security of mail-in ballots" and that the administration would continue to work to implement them to boost "the safety and security of our elections." The Postal Service said it would not comment because of the pending lawsuit. National Democrats on Tuesday cited the rule in asking the federal judge in the Washington case to block Trump's order after he declined to do so last spring, saying the administration at the time had not taken concrete action. WATCH: Ousted Election Assistance Commission chair on Trump's effort to control voting In Boston, Talwani also found that the administration had violated a separate injunction she had placed on the Postal Service in drafting the new rule, although she did not take any action against the government. The League of Women Voters originally filed that lawsuit, and on Wednesday they also asked for a new court order blocking the mail voting plan. Voting by mail has long been on Trump's radar Trump has long targeted mail voting, which he falsely blames for his 2020 election loss and is disproportionately used by Democrats as a result of Trump's condemnations. Since returning to power, Trump has tried to claim authority over election rules, saying he thinks Republicans should "take over" vote counting in Democratic areas. He issued his first election executive order just months after retaking office, attempting to require documentary proof of citizenship to vote, among other changes. He has also been pushing a sweeping election bill that has stalled in the Senate amid opposition from Democrats and even some within his own party. A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now